Rick Gaber

Moral relativists are staunchly uncertain, adamantly indecisive, self-righteously impotent and defiantly irrelevant." (That is, unless they're meddling, militant pacifists, in which case they actually legitimize and empower the evil and, as its accessories, they themselves have "blood on their hands." )

The land of the free will cease to be when it's no longer the home of the brave.

The United States was supposed to have a limited government because the founders knew governmental power attracts swarms of crooks, demagogues and despots as surely as horse manure attracts swarms of horseflies.

Give a good man great powers and crooks grab his job.

Overload the police with victimless crimes and other minutiae and eventually only creeps and bullies remain cops.

Defend EVERY ONE of your rights. When any one is given up none of the rest can last.

If you want to get rich and/or stay that way, or if you want your kids or other loved ones to do so, you'd damn well better stand up for everyone else's right to do so too.

A moderate is either someone who has no moral code of his own, or if he does, then he's someone who doesn't have the guts to take sides between good and evil.

People who refuse to take a stand wind up appeasing evil, feeding it, even voting for it, and finally, dying from it.

No matter who you are or what you believe, you have to understand that some day the worst control-freaks among your bitterest enemies will control the federal government, and you better have restored effective, working constitutional limitations on that government before that time arrives.

When most people say things such as, 'let's pass a law to have the government give (anything besides safety and a court system) to everybody,' they're playing a game of 'let's pretend that everybody from whom the government must first take it won't mind'. This, of course, demonstrates either a totally naive or a totally cynical reliance on the sanction of the victims.

The most ridiculous, most despicable of all con artists are those pompous, condescending, so-called 'intellectuals' who purport to use the intellect to 'prove' the worthlessness of human intelligence - and thereby, of the intellect. They don't even seem to realize all they're doing is admitting their own self-negation in the most pathetic way possible, in public, to all but the most gullible.